Thursday, August 18, 2005
Just who IS Cindy Sheehan?
UPDATE: Mulch has decided to start up his own blog. Apparently "I" am to blame for this... even though technically all I said was "...do you have a blog or r ya just a reader?" Doesn't take much to motivate this guy...! Visit The Mulch Maker's Guide to the Galaxy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This was posted by a commentator in response to an article at Media Outsider. The original topic involves Cindy Sheehan, the infamous mom protesting outside George W. Bush's holiday ranch where he is....taking a holiday. This is the biggest American-grown (or at least the commentator implies he is American) bashing I've heard in a quite a while...
Mulch: "1st off these supposed "terrorist", the ingenious creation of the neo-cons to kill darkies and encroach on US freedoms, the faceless nameless hidden in shadows forces that conspire to kill us (not from iraq mind you as they are secular), yet we will be fighting for 100 years according to cheney, dont have fox news. they dont have TVs, the sand filled shacks that they live in dont have cable, the scarce (contaminated) food and water is the main concern. they dont see this. what a great creation. an enemy we can niether see nor kill, so we can never win and always lose just one more freedom or child to the cause of "liberty"what a fucking jokejesus never said "kill the darkies." jesus said forgiveness was key you fucking hypocrites. read your bible and put down "art of war". or do you think we need to keep money pumping into the defense industry, the industry OWNED by the Bushes and the Bin Ladins and the carlysle groups.you are a bunch of sheep proudly feeding your children as cannon fodder. brag about how you'll sacrifice your kids to fatten goerge and his cronies wallets. show how smart you are. after all, if we werent oppressing and performing genocide on a people they wouldnt want to kill usread your history, not fox news you fucking fat ass sheep (yes US citizens are a majority of overweight greedy little pigs while people starve worldwide). we blame the US (not America by the way, you idiots dont even know America is 2 continents, NOT a country because all your brainwashed minds are capable of is parroting hannity and o riley and bush) because WE DID IT. The way of life Bush says hes protecting is unethical. the "fuel" for this way of life is poor peoples blood. we starve and kill people to keep us bloated and fat in our air conditioned SUVS. Read your fucking history you ignorant slovenly pigs!THINK! No WMDs. No Link betweein 9/11 and Iraq. Just oil, haliberton and a bush vendetta, and you sheep GLADLY pay your children. Its a good thing Jesus forgives you because the only word I can think of is unforgivable.good luck on your tour. maybe you can find a family of muslims crossing the road that your caravan can gleefully run over so you can feel like you are doing your part. and quit watching the fox crap, read history and THINK FOR YOURSELF. i dont think you would do what you do or think like you thought if you truly understood what was happening in the worldfunny, in iraq they call it nationalism, over here its PATRIOTISM. someone smart enough to understand and explain the difference? when we do it its good. when they do it , its bad. when they kill civilians, its terrorism, when we kill civilians, its "spreading freedom"funny how no one in the world sides with you unless george threatens them ("you're either with us or against us")that was a threat if you arent smart enuff to figure it out, and we are the only ones who ever dropped the bomb in anger. now go eat your "freedom fries" and choke on em-MULCH"
Curtis: "I think you covered all the approved talking points, Mulchie. Good job."
Mulch: "hmmm, curtis, you give me a 12 word response that consists of over 16% of bill orileys words verbatum. well, ill give you a little more to chew on, hopefully there is enough medicine to cure yousomeone told me that you consider urself libertarian. as far as I know, libertarians most BASIC premise is "dont tell me how to mow my lawn, i won't tell you how to mow yours"i am most comfortable with that philosophy over any other, but to blindly believe all you are told with no facts?i must stress FACTSseems war, ie "imposing our will" is not very libertarian. is the word hypocrite the one im looking for?no thats not the word.its like you never bothered to read 1984, or didnt understand the significancemaybe theres another word that appliesits like you know nothing about psychology, or the subtleties of marketingsee, bush calls it the "save our forest act" he then allows the timber industry to go logging into nationaly PROTECTED forests. yup state parks, designed to keep the timber industry away. why call it save our forest when he cuts it down? to save it from fire of course, cuz u cant burn down what isnt there. or how about the "clean water act" in which the same levels of toxic mercury are allowed to stand for an additional 10 YEARS!!!! hmmm. how does allowing a toxin to stay at sustained levels for 10 additional years make clean water?or the "no child left behind." I know several teachers in several states who are agonizing about what this has done to their schools, but they don't know whats really going on huh? they aren't DC insiders or Fox news hosts.there is a reason some people refer to this as orwellian. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orwellian with apologies to Mr Orwell for his name illustrating the point i made about nationalism vs patriotism)read the FACTS, apply logic, and stop listening to ur damn "talking points" for guidenceyou're not a soldier anymore curtis, ur allowed to think for yourself. i know at times it can be hard and scary, but you CAN do it now.i saw 2 interviews with bush, one from 2001, and one from 2005 where he was asked about global warming. his answer was the same both times, that we need to look at the science before we do anything about it http://www.ucsusa.org/global_environment/rsi/page.cfm?pageID=13207000 scientists signed this statement. SEVEN THOUSAND. (count to 7,000 to understand that number). the following paragraph only showing a fraction of the corruption and manipulation of the truth"Highly qualified scientists have been dropped from advisory committees dealing with childhood lead poisoning, environmental and reproductive health, and drug abuse, while individuals associated with or working for industries subject to regulation have been appointed to these bodies." http://www.ucsusa.org/global_environment/rsi/page.cfm?pageID=1335 are these 7000 scientists–Nobel laureates, leading medical experts, former federal agency directors, and university chairs and presidents all getting their talking points from Michael Moore too?how many scientists have endorsed bush? is it > or greater than 7,000? do the math and quit baa-ing the company line! remember, ALL sheep eventually get fleeced.how many experts does it take to counter the word of your new god, greenback george?meanwhile in those 4 years he invaded 2 countries, 1 on the basis of WMD mobile labs from a single source named "curveball" (how orwellian read http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19831-2005Apr1.html , and no Michael Moore didnt write the article) and a forged uranium document, he found enough proof and science in that time about sending our boys to their deaths (no mention of the darkies), but 7000 highly educated scientists cant be trusted to tell the truth about science.its marketing at its finest, say 1 thing do another repeatedly. lie with ur folksy drawl and people believe u, make sure a flag is in every camera shot and say the words "security" "liberty" and "freedom" until your weakened sheep are drooling in their own laps with the correct warm and fuzzy response. Since i got my "talking points" right, maybe you have heard this one:"He who trades liberty for security deserves neither and will lose both."think about that next time the patriot act wants to sneak and peak citizens to keep us safeoh yeah, thomas jefferson said that.and um, i saw interviews with condoleeza and colin in summer 2001, BOTH saying saddam didnt have WMDs and couldnt even attack his neighbors, much less the good ole boys in the USA. why do you think they were so "sure" he had wmds? musta really pissed them off when they found out he destroyed them years ago. would it have angered you to know that even if they were found, that the Chemical and biological weapons Rummy personally gave Saddam, that their lifespan would have made them 100% useless?Ooops, must be Michael Moore who took the photo. A simple image google of "rumsfeld saddam" will, erm, provide logic proven FACTS, a concept that you have been conditioned to repel from as FACTS dont make you feel all warm and fuzzyand now tonights "talking points" your "talking points" curtosy of fox news and friends, are cliff notes to the world. unfortunatly, your cliff notes not only skip over some important details such as facts and logic, but they are WRONG. sometimes, if you are smart enough, you can actually THINK FOR YOURSELF, but please do so responsibly. you need more then cliff notes in life and death decisions. would you be ok knowing the guy flying the airplane you are riding in got through flight school on cliff notes?i guess watching invasions live on tv is the new great reality show. the thrill of geraldo possibly getting his nuts blown off on live tv makes people clamor for more war to fuel it. yes, I am speculating that this illness is a direct result of finding entertainment in misery. the line has been blurred. go after violent video games, but show people blown to peices on live tv and we will pile on the ratings and accept just about anything spoon fed from rush, orielly, hannity, wolfowitz, rumsfeld, bush, and cheney. its a sickness people, wake up from your stuper, get healed and fix the source of the problem.the first step is addmitting you have a problem. after you do that, we can fix it, together, as united states. but as long as we are collectively in denial, there is only 1 way we can go. i want to be proud of where im from, BUT RIGHT NOW im ashamed, and i have good reason to be. as a representative government, every damn missle that lands has my name on it from my tax dollarsi have logic and a conscience, and its hard to sleep at night with blood on my hands. i want my country to be the great good they pretend to be. I dont hate the 2 continents known as "America". I dont even hate the united states. but the people are not only becoming dangerously apathetic to reality, they are ignoring it COMPLETELY for this magic land where a simple failed businessman with a C average in college and from a well connected and wealthy family says one thing and does the opposite and we are all left with a warm happy feeling after the laugh track ends (excpet of course for the dead people and their media whore "flip flopping" moms, i mean "the loved one")your right wing media attack dogs have got this all wrong. its not about cindy. its not about casey. it is the simple folks like me demanding an explanation for this lunacy. she represents me. she represents me, and you. and everyone else he lied to and killed. its time to pay the piper for his sins, if only he would come out of hiding and face the musici didnt have a "loved one" die in iraq, but I want to know why we are there too. so do many more people nationwide that your attack dogs are galvanizing into action. as bush hides in his ranch afraid to leave the comfort of his book on the History of Salt and face a grieving mother ( http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/nation/12393945.htm ), hes not ignoring her in his cozy little vacation hideaway, hes ignoring us. he wont tell her why her kid died, he wont tell the rest of us why he has done what he has done.and btw, im a christian, you tell me one time jesus killed someone. you tell me one time when jesus endorsed the death penalty. you tell me one time jesus backed a war. you can't.periodDoes your "angelic christian" leader, who studies scripture actually know better then christ?how orwellian."
Read full article and comments at Media Outsider.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This was posted by a commentator in response to an article at Media Outsider. The original topic involves Cindy Sheehan, the infamous mom protesting outside George W. Bush's holiday ranch where he is....taking a holiday. This is the biggest American-grown (or at least the commentator implies he is American) bashing I've heard in a quite a while...
Mulch: "1st off these supposed "terrorist", the ingenious creation of the neo-cons to kill darkies and encroach on US freedoms, the faceless nameless hidden in shadows forces that conspire to kill us (not from iraq mind you as they are secular), yet we will be fighting for 100 years according to cheney, dont have fox news. they dont have TVs, the sand filled shacks that they live in dont have cable, the scarce (contaminated) food and water is the main concern. they dont see this. what a great creation. an enemy we can niether see nor kill, so we can never win and always lose just one more freedom or child to the cause of "liberty"what a fucking jokejesus never said "kill the darkies." jesus said forgiveness was key you fucking hypocrites. read your bible and put down "art of war". or do you think we need to keep money pumping into the defense industry, the industry OWNED by the Bushes and the Bin Ladins and the carlysle groups.you are a bunch of sheep proudly feeding your children as cannon fodder. brag about how you'll sacrifice your kids to fatten goerge and his cronies wallets. show how smart you are. after all, if we werent oppressing and performing genocide on a people they wouldnt want to kill usread your history, not fox news you fucking fat ass sheep (yes US citizens are a majority of overweight greedy little pigs while people starve worldwide). we blame the US (not America by the way, you idiots dont even know America is 2 continents, NOT a country because all your brainwashed minds are capable of is parroting hannity and o riley and bush) because WE DID IT. The way of life Bush says hes protecting is unethical. the "fuel" for this way of life is poor peoples blood. we starve and kill people to keep us bloated and fat in our air conditioned SUVS. Read your fucking history you ignorant slovenly pigs!THINK! No WMDs. No Link betweein 9/11 and Iraq. Just oil, haliberton and a bush vendetta, and you sheep GLADLY pay your children. Its a good thing Jesus forgives you because the only word I can think of is unforgivable.good luck on your tour. maybe you can find a family of muslims crossing the road that your caravan can gleefully run over so you can feel like you are doing your part. and quit watching the fox crap, read history and THINK FOR YOURSELF. i dont think you would do what you do or think like you thought if you truly understood what was happening in the worldfunny, in iraq they call it nationalism, over here its PATRIOTISM. someone smart enough to understand and explain the difference? when we do it its good. when they do it , its bad. when they kill civilians, its terrorism, when we kill civilians, its "spreading freedom"funny how no one in the world sides with you unless george threatens them ("you're either with us or against us")that was a threat if you arent smart enuff to figure it out, and we are the only ones who ever dropped the bomb in anger. now go eat your "freedom fries" and choke on em-MULCH"
Curtis: "I think you covered all the approved talking points, Mulchie. Good job."
Mulch: "hmmm, curtis, you give me a 12 word response that consists of over 16% of bill orileys words verbatum. well, ill give you a little more to chew on, hopefully there is enough medicine to cure yousomeone told me that you consider urself libertarian. as far as I know, libertarians most BASIC premise is "dont tell me how to mow my lawn, i won't tell you how to mow yours"i am most comfortable with that philosophy over any other, but to blindly believe all you are told with no facts?i must stress FACTSseems war, ie "imposing our will" is not very libertarian. is the word hypocrite the one im looking for?no thats not the word.its like you never bothered to read 1984, or didnt understand the significancemaybe theres another word that appliesits like you know nothing about psychology, or the subtleties of marketingsee, bush calls it the "save our forest act" he then allows the timber industry to go logging into nationaly PROTECTED forests. yup state parks, designed to keep the timber industry away. why call it save our forest when he cuts it down? to save it from fire of course, cuz u cant burn down what isnt there. or how about the "clean water act" in which the same levels of toxic mercury are allowed to stand for an additional 10 YEARS!!!! hmmm. how does allowing a toxin to stay at sustained levels for 10 additional years make clean water?or the "no child left behind." I know several teachers in several states who are agonizing about what this has done to their schools, but they don't know whats really going on huh? they aren't DC insiders or Fox news hosts.there is a reason some people refer to this as orwellian. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orwellian with apologies to Mr Orwell for his name illustrating the point i made about nationalism vs patriotism)read the FACTS, apply logic, and stop listening to ur damn "talking points" for guidenceyou're not a soldier anymore curtis, ur allowed to think for yourself. i know at times it can be hard and scary, but you CAN do it now.i saw 2 interviews with bush, one from 2001, and one from 2005 where he was asked about global warming. his answer was the same both times, that we need to look at the science before we do anything about it http://www.ucsusa.org/global_environment/rsi/page.cfm?pageID=13207000 scientists signed this statement. SEVEN THOUSAND. (count to 7,000 to understand that number). the following paragraph only showing a fraction of the corruption and manipulation of the truth"Highly qualified scientists have been dropped from advisory committees dealing with childhood lead poisoning, environmental and reproductive health, and drug abuse, while individuals associated with or working for industries subject to regulation have been appointed to these bodies." http://www.ucsusa.org/global_environment/rsi/page.cfm?pageID=1335 are these 7000 scientists–Nobel laureates, leading medical experts, former federal agency directors, and university chairs and presidents all getting their talking points from Michael Moore too?how many scientists have endorsed bush? is it > or greater than 7,000? do the math and quit baa-ing the company line! remember, ALL sheep eventually get fleeced.how many experts does it take to counter the word of your new god, greenback george?meanwhile in those 4 years he invaded 2 countries, 1 on the basis of WMD mobile labs from a single source named "curveball" (how orwellian read http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19831-2005Apr1.html , and no Michael Moore didnt write the article) and a forged uranium document, he found enough proof and science in that time about sending our boys to their deaths (no mention of the darkies), but 7000 highly educated scientists cant be trusted to tell the truth about science.its marketing at its finest, say 1 thing do another repeatedly. lie with ur folksy drawl and people believe u, make sure a flag is in every camera shot and say the words "security" "liberty" and "freedom" until your weakened sheep are drooling in their own laps with the correct warm and fuzzy response. Since i got my "talking points" right, maybe you have heard this one:"He who trades liberty for security deserves neither and will lose both."think about that next time the patriot act wants to sneak and peak citizens to keep us safeoh yeah, thomas jefferson said that.and um, i saw interviews with condoleeza and colin in summer 2001, BOTH saying saddam didnt have WMDs and couldnt even attack his neighbors, much less the good ole boys in the USA. why do you think they were so "sure" he had wmds? musta really pissed them off when they found out he destroyed them years ago. would it have angered you to know that even if they were found, that the Chemical and biological weapons Rummy personally gave Saddam, that their lifespan would have made them 100% useless?Ooops, must be Michael Moore who took the photo. A simple image google of "rumsfeld saddam" will, erm, provide logic proven FACTS, a concept that you have been conditioned to repel from as FACTS dont make you feel all warm and fuzzyand now tonights "talking points" your "talking points" curtosy of fox news and friends, are cliff notes to the world. unfortunatly, your cliff notes not only skip over some important details such as facts and logic, but they are WRONG. sometimes, if you are smart enough, you can actually THINK FOR YOURSELF, but please do so responsibly. you need more then cliff notes in life and death decisions. would you be ok knowing the guy flying the airplane you are riding in got through flight school on cliff notes?i guess watching invasions live on tv is the new great reality show. the thrill of geraldo possibly getting his nuts blown off on live tv makes people clamor for more war to fuel it. yes, I am speculating that this illness is a direct result of finding entertainment in misery. the line has been blurred. go after violent video games, but show people blown to peices on live tv and we will pile on the ratings and accept just about anything spoon fed from rush, orielly, hannity, wolfowitz, rumsfeld, bush, and cheney. its a sickness people, wake up from your stuper, get healed and fix the source of the problem.the first step is addmitting you have a problem. after you do that, we can fix it, together, as united states. but as long as we are collectively in denial, there is only 1 way we can go. i want to be proud of where im from, BUT RIGHT NOW im ashamed, and i have good reason to be. as a representative government, every damn missle that lands has my name on it from my tax dollarsi have logic and a conscience, and its hard to sleep at night with blood on my hands. i want my country to be the great good they pretend to be. I dont hate the 2 continents known as "America". I dont even hate the united states. but the people are not only becoming dangerously apathetic to reality, they are ignoring it COMPLETELY for this magic land where a simple failed businessman with a C average in college and from a well connected and wealthy family says one thing and does the opposite and we are all left with a warm happy feeling after the laugh track ends (excpet of course for the dead people and their media whore "flip flopping" moms, i mean "the loved one")your right wing media attack dogs have got this all wrong. its not about cindy. its not about casey. it is the simple folks like me demanding an explanation for this lunacy. she represents me. she represents me, and you. and everyone else he lied to and killed. its time to pay the piper for his sins, if only he would come out of hiding and face the musici didnt have a "loved one" die in iraq, but I want to know why we are there too. so do many more people nationwide that your attack dogs are galvanizing into action. as bush hides in his ranch afraid to leave the comfort of his book on the History of Salt and face a grieving mother ( http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/nation/12393945.htm ), hes not ignoring her in his cozy little vacation hideaway, hes ignoring us. he wont tell her why her kid died, he wont tell the rest of us why he has done what he has done.and btw, im a christian, you tell me one time jesus killed someone. you tell me one time when jesus endorsed the death penalty. you tell me one time jesus backed a war. you can't.periodDoes your "angelic christian" leader, who studies scripture actually know better then christ?how orwellian."
Read full article and comments at Media Outsider.
Comments:
<< Home
oh boy, I am now a crossover blogger
yup wordy, but it beats the slogan oriented catch phrases that some presidents of the united states use
thanks for the publicity, Clyde, but I wouldn't refer to it as "bashing" so much as trying to end the lies and excuses and go about the business of cleaning up our collective mess
it's time someone tried to take responsibility around here
yup wordy, but it beats the slogan oriented catch phrases that some presidents of the united states use
thanks for the publicity, Clyde, but I wouldn't refer to it as "bashing" so much as trying to end the lies and excuses and go about the business of cleaning up our collective mess
it's time someone tried to take responsibility around here
# posted by 
: 2:19 AM
: 2:19 AM
Yeah, Mulch is pretty 'wordy'... But he is pretty damn articulate and thorough with his conversations for someone with A.D.D...heh. I hope you don't mind me archiving your comments on my blog, Mulch. I wouldn't be so sure this would qualify as "publicity" as we probably get visitors as often as gun-totting farmers get trespassers on their property.
If you were wondering, the slogan at the top of the blog is from one of Team America's songs... Would be cool if that song played everytime someone loaded this website..heheh. Good luck with your blog. I went there earlier looking forward to seeing your first post but was greeted by a nice white empty page...?
If you were wondering, the slogan at the top of the blog is from one of Team America's songs... Would be cool if that song played everytime someone loaded this website..heheh. Good luck with your blog. I went there earlier looking forward to seeing your first post but was greeted by a nice white empty page...?
Like I said Clyde, my perspective is altered. I have been mad at the wrong people. we knew bush and company were liars but we put them right back into a position where they could continue to do damage. now they got 1, probably 2 supreme court justice picks, and it appears they aren't taking any chances, young and far right is the first pick. The legacy is now in place for years.
So I'm not sure where my head is right now. I got some thinking to do, because my arguements were completely shred. I wish I could transcribe the phone call that did it, as it was fascinating, but I guess it is lost to history
maybe I should start with my Sonny Bono article.
I need a "montage"
yeah, I liked about 45 minutes of team america. I think they stretched the concept too far and diluted it tho. Some parts were really funny, the music, just like South Park the Movie was top notch
but where southpark had MORE then enough to justify its exsistance as a movie (and really was a kick ass musical that followed the formula for musicals perfectly) team america was just too long
but its worth seeing. America, fuck yeah!
and thank you for the compliments. Anyone who can clearly illustrate exactly how insane and incongruent ann coulter is while alledging she is so bad that she might very well be a plant for the liberals has my vote =)
funny stuff
So I'm not sure where my head is right now. I got some thinking to do, because my arguements were completely shred. I wish I could transcribe the phone call that did it, as it was fascinating, but I guess it is lost to history
maybe I should start with my Sonny Bono article.
I need a "montage"
yeah, I liked about 45 minutes of team america. I think they stretched the concept too far and diluted it tho. Some parts were really funny, the music, just like South Park the Movie was top notch
but where southpark had MORE then enough to justify its exsistance as a movie (and really was a kick ass musical that followed the formula for musicals perfectly) team america was just too long
but its worth seeing. America, fuck yeah!
and thank you for the compliments. Anyone who can clearly illustrate exactly how insane and incongruent ann coulter is while alledging she is so bad that she might very well be a plant for the liberals has my vote =)
funny stuff
Hmmm... Yes US citizens are to blame for voting the rock back into power. But I dont think they are the ONLY ones to blame. I'd rather not make assertions...but I would recommend that you see the video I linked in my post further down the page Confronting the Evidence. Towards the end, there is discussion about how neo-cons have hijacked the american flag for their own agenda and very very disturbing conspiracies that make references to Pearl Harbour and its effects on the American people that 9/11 had as well. See the facts, the evidence. Listen to opinions. Form your own. It is quite a lengthy video at 2hrs40min.. even for people without ADD. Which makes me wonder how the hell all those teenage girls managed to watch through the entire of Titanic....SEVEN bloody times or more.
Team America definitely had its moments. But you cant blame Matt & Trey. They were being spontaneous and I recall one of them saying in an interview about how they were filming half way and then asking themselves how they got into this shit. hehehe..
Btw, you'll have to credit Leech (my blog's other squishy blood-sucking member) for the post on Ann Coulter. But he's not here right now. He's still somewhere kicking himself really really hard... for making her worthy of a blog article.
Team America definitely had its moments. But you cant blame Matt & Trey. They were being spontaneous and I recall one of them saying in an interview about how they were filming half way and then asking themselves how they got into this shit. hehehe..
Btw, you'll have to credit Leech (my blog's other squishy blood-sucking member) for the post on Ann Coulter. But he's not here right now. He's still somewhere kicking himself really really hard... for making her worthy of a blog article.
"Anyway, I was sitting there, and my Chief of Staff -- well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake. And something was wrong with the plane, or -- anyway, I'm sitting there, listening to the briefing, and Andy Card came and said, "America is under attack."
And in the meantime, this teacher was going on about the curriculum, and I was thinking about what it meant for America to be under attack. It was an amazing thought. But I made up my mind that if America was under attack, we'd get them. (Applause.) I wasn't interested in lawyers, I wasn't interested in a bunch of debate. I was interested in finding out who did it and bringing them to justice. I also knew that they would try to hide, and anybody who provided haven, help, food, would be held accountable by the United States of America. (Applause.) "
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020105-3.html
"Thank you, Jordan. Well, Jordan, you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my Chief of Staff, Andy Card -- actually, I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident.
But I was whisked off there, I didn't have much time to think about it. And I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my Chief of Staff, who is sitting over here, walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower, America is under attack."
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011204-17.html
You know i have a lot of good information but the word "conspiracy theory" has an immediate negative response to anything the phrase is directed to. I can't give that to a critic right out of the gate, as every word I write after that will be effectively discredited
it's kind of like even though Michael Jackson was found not guilty, the word pedophile has branded him for life
However, I must point out one thing that strikes me as incongruent with the facts. notice this is cited from the OFFICIAL White House website, so again, my citations are at the top of the food chain.
The first plane hitting the building was only captured by 1 camera. If was a handheld videotape, NOT a live video camera.
That means the camera that recorded the first plane hitting the building had to have the video tape ejected, and the tape run down physically in person to a broadcast position.
It is 100% impossible for that tape to have been delivered and broadcast prior to the second plane being broadcast live.
So Bush has at no less then 2 times claimed to have watched the first plane hit prior to walking in that classroom, where he was told on camera about the second plane as he pondered "what it meant for America to be under attack"
For those of us well versed in logic, there are only 2 possible scenarios that would allow Bush to make this statement.
#1) Bush Lied about the series of events of that day.
#2) Bush knew about it prior and watched the impact of the first plane live via special closed circuit feed. A feed no one but the president and his inner circle have every seen. (see also #1)
please, if anyone can tell me an option #3, I would LOVE to hear it
I can start my blog strong, but if I do I run the risk of ruining my credibility as some "conspiracy theorist"
I am a marketer, and a con man, and a student of mass media and human psychology, so um, yeah, not a good place to start, but I do know the buttons people push to elicit the desired response. I need to start low and aim hi for maximum impact
So as I said, you will likely see a blank page for awhile while I work alot of this out in my brain.
But as much as I try not to be cynical, NOTHING would surprise me after the events surrounding the 2000 election.
*edited post to italisize quotes and bold commentary*
Post a Comment
And in the meantime, this teacher was going on about the curriculum, and I was thinking about what it meant for America to be under attack. It was an amazing thought. But I made up my mind that if America was under attack, we'd get them. (Applause.) I wasn't interested in lawyers, I wasn't interested in a bunch of debate. I was interested in finding out who did it and bringing them to justice. I also knew that they would try to hide, and anybody who provided haven, help, food, would be held accountable by the United States of America. (Applause.) "
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020105-3.html
"Thank you, Jordan. Well, Jordan, you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my Chief of Staff, Andy Card -- actually, I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident.
But I was whisked off there, I didn't have much time to think about it. And I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my Chief of Staff, who is sitting over here, walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower, America is under attack."
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011204-17.html
You know i have a lot of good information but the word "conspiracy theory" has an immediate negative response to anything the phrase is directed to. I can't give that to a critic right out of the gate, as every word I write after that will be effectively discredited
it's kind of like even though Michael Jackson was found not guilty, the word pedophile has branded him for life
However, I must point out one thing that strikes me as incongruent with the facts. notice this is cited from the OFFICIAL White House website, so again, my citations are at the top of the food chain.
The first plane hitting the building was only captured by 1 camera. If was a handheld videotape, NOT a live video camera.
That means the camera that recorded the first plane hitting the building had to have the video tape ejected, and the tape run down physically in person to a broadcast position.
It is 100% impossible for that tape to have been delivered and broadcast prior to the second plane being broadcast live.
So Bush has at no less then 2 times claimed to have watched the first plane hit prior to walking in that classroom, where he was told on camera about the second plane as he pondered "what it meant for America to be under attack"
For those of us well versed in logic, there are only 2 possible scenarios that would allow Bush to make this statement.
#1) Bush Lied about the series of events of that day.
#2) Bush knew about it prior and watched the impact of the first plane live via special closed circuit feed. A feed no one but the president and his inner circle have every seen. (see also #1)
please, if anyone can tell me an option #3, I would LOVE to hear it
I can start my blog strong, but if I do I run the risk of ruining my credibility as some "conspiracy theorist"
I am a marketer, and a con man, and a student of mass media and human psychology, so um, yeah, not a good place to start, but I do know the buttons people push to elicit the desired response. I need to start low and aim hi for maximum impact
So as I said, you will likely see a blank page for awhile while I work alot of this out in my brain.
But as much as I try not to be cynical, NOTHING would surprise me after the events surrounding the 2000 election.
*edited post to italisize quotes and bold commentary*
<< Home
